hill is getting into the holiday spirit. house speaker nancy pelosi lit the capital christmas tree tonight. the tree, an 85-foot blue spruce, came all the way from arizona where schoolchildren made the more than 6,000 ornaments. thanks for being with us tonight. please join us tomorrow night. next, coming up is a campbell brown special, "global warming: trick or truth?" tonight, breaking news. a massive airport security breach. the tsa posts its screening secrets online for everyone, including terrorists, to see. how in the world did this happen? plus, a special investigation, "global warming: trick or truth?" the big announcement tonight, this is the hottest decade on record. >> the world is getting warmer and humans are to blame. >> scientists across the globe say urgent action is needed now, but a hacked e-mail scandal has

skeptics saying, not so fast. >> we should not be making decisions that will cost the american rate payer billions or even trillions of dollars based upon scientific fascism. >> who's telling the truth and who has their facts all wrong? we're taking you around the world tonight for answers. welcome, everybody. tonight, a major announcement coming out of the climate change conference in copenhagen. hanging over it all, hacked e-mails that some say call into question the very science behind global warming. we are looki ining at all the angles, but we'll start tonight as always with the "mash-up." and our top story tonight, a secret government manual for screening airline passengers accidentally making it online for all to see. >> it's being called the most serious security breach since the creation of the tsa after

the 9/11 attacks. >> reporter: the 93-page manual prepared for federal airport screeners shows sample of law enforcement and official credentials, federal air marshals, cia officers, and members of congress, i.d.s which can criminals or terrorists could copy. >> the secret details have been online for everyone to see. most damaging, say officials, what size electrical wire can go undetected by airport screening machines, valuable information for a bomb maker. >> each page of the report carries this notice. "warning, this record contains sensitive security information. no part may be disclosed without a need to know." >> the transportation safety administration is promising a full review. we'll have much more on this troubling story coming up in a few minutes. turning now, though, to afghanistan and a surprise visit from pentagon chief bob gates. he sat down with afghan president hamid karzai who said afghanistan will be counting on american help for a very long time.

>> afghanistan's president raising serious doubts about the new 18-month u.s. time line for his country. he's talking about decades. >> for a number of years, maybe for another 15 to 20 years, afghanistan will not be able to sustain a force of that nature and capability with its own resources. >> defense secretary gates today urged president hamid karzai to speed up the training of afghan security forces so they can take over as soon as possible from the u.s. >> as president obama has made very clear, this is not an open-ended commitment on the part of the united states. >> this nation's top commander there closed ranks today with the commander in chief, as expected, on his new plan for this surge and exit policy. >> the next 18 months will likely be decisive and ultimately enable success. i fully support the president's

decision. >> and we have breaking news to tell you about right now. a possible deal on health care reform. dana bash on the hill with the very latest on what's going on. dana, what have you got? >> reporter: well, democrats in the senate, moderates and liberals, have been meeting behind closed doors in marathon talks to try to figure out an alternative to the very controversial public option. and sources coming out of the meeting just moments ago told us that they believe they have a tentative deal to work around this public option and find a way to, they think, accommodate moderate democrats and liberal democrats, moderate democrats who never wanted a public option and liberal democrats who have been demanding it. we're waiting for all the details, but the headline is that breaking news tonight in that they have -- they say that they have a tentative deal among divided democrats on this issue of a public option. campbell? >> all right. dana bash, we'll be waiting for more information on that. appreciate it. we're going to turn now from health care policy to a personal

health care crisis. bryant gum babel speaking personally for the very first time about his battle with lung cancer. he broke the news this morning on "live! with regis and kelly". >> two months ago i had cancer surgery. >> what?! >> yes. >> are you kidding me? >> no. >> oh, my gosh. i thought we were friends. >> we are. >> what is going on? >> hillary and i kept it private. >> okay. are you okay? do you want to discuss it? >> well, it's nothing to hide from, they took a malignant tumor, to go part of my lung and some other goodies and the pathology on most stuff came back benign, but i went through some treatment and it's done now. and we hope it's over and done. >> it's done now? >> we hope. >> gumbel said he wanted to keep the news private, even hiding his condition from his staff of his hbo show "real sports."

and moving on to something a little bit lighter, a picture worth, well, you know, behold the oddest couple ever, lady gaga and queen elizabeth. the meeting of the royals took place in england last night. the ladies of "the view" chewed it over this morning. >> so lady gaga is wearing an outfit -- that's the outfit, okay? >> she's dressed like queen elizabeth i. >> and did not take off her sunglasses. >> that was red latex she was wearing at her homage. >> hopefully she doesn't have an allergy. >> it keeps people interested. >> the queen also met miley cyrus at the very same event. must have been quite a night for her majesty. flts and that brings us to the punch line. this is courtesy of david letterman. he, of course, was recently embroiled in his very own sex scandal, so he has a distinctive take on the most recent fallen star. >> boy, looks like that tiger

woods is having some trouble, huh? you know, i was thinking, if this thing had happened three months ago, i would have material for a year! i wish he would stop calling me for advice. >> david letterman, everybody. that is the "mash-up." a massive security breach tonight being called shocking and reckless. the tsa posts its secret screening manual online for all the world to see. plus, our special investigation, "global warming: trick or truth?" scientists say this is the hottest year on record, so why do some skeptics say they are still not buying it? >> the truth is the truth. the facts are the facts. this whole theory of man-made global warming is just that. it is a theory. [ female announcer ] olay total effects has 7 powerful skin benefits that brighten, hydrate,

smooth, even tone, reduce the look of lines and pores, and lock in moisture. 7-in-1 olay total effects. now your card comes with a way to plan for what matters to you. introducing blueprint. blueprint is free and only for chase customers. it lets you choose what purchases you want to pay in full to avoid interest...with full pay. and those you split... you decide how to pay over time. if having a plan matters. chase what matters. create your own blueprint at chase.com/blueprint. (p. darwin) to maintain energy security in this country,

we need all sources. alternative energies, solar, wind. and there are vast resources of oil and natural gas here in the u.s. that are untapped. we're able now to access oil and gas a mile down and seven miles out. we can do this safely. we can do it in an environmentally friendly way, and provide enough energy to fuel 50 million cars and 100 million homes for 25 years.

breaking news tonight. the tsa, formed after 9/11 to keep you safe in the skies, has allowed a massive security breach, accidentally posting a detailed airport screening manual online for pretty much anybody to see, including terrorists. 93 pages outlining which people and items are supposed to be screened, which are allowed to go through without a second thought. everything from diplomatic pouches to prisoners, complete with photos of official i.d.s that some now fear could be duplicated. the tsa says what was posted was both outdated and unclassified, but the whole thing creating outrage, nonetheless. and with me now to talk us through this is fran townsend, a cnn national security contributor and former homeland security adviser to former president bush. also, clark kent irvin, the former homeland security inspector general with us tonight as well.

fran, in the grand scheme of our national security, how big a deal is this? >> you know, campbell, you know it's a big deal when the department itself begins to go into sort of press management, right? this is not really that big a deal. we've updated it six times since then. we didn't really implement this one. they've also said to with uus, this was the supervisor's manual. look, if you want to judge it, you've got to look at the manual that was released. this has got incredibly detailed information in it. it's got to be of concern. and frankly, while they're going to do a deeper dive into what happened and look back, we need to know what they're going to do right now. what are they doing to put random measures in place so that terrorists can't go to school on the manual that's now out there and potentially do us harm. people are rightly outraged by this release, i think. >> and let me just show viewers what we're talking about here, fran. we just printed it out. this is a couple hundred of pages.

clark, walk us through exactly what was disclosed here. what were the most damning disclosures, do you believe, in this document? >> it goes on and on. it says, for example, only 20% of carry-on backs are hand checked for explosives. it says at peak travel times when there are lots of travelers and you would think that security would be at its highest, that screeners have to check only 25% of the time, if they choose to, use these black lights, special lights, to check i.d.s and authentic them. it says if you're coming through a screening checkpoint and go through the metal detector and you're in a wheelchair or wearing orthopedic shoes, it's discretionary for that officer whether to check. this is the most security breach the tsa has been involved in since 9/11 and since the tsa 's inception. >> so, fran, what happens now? they've said -- i've actually got a statement from them.

here's a very brief bit of their statement. a full review now under way. the tsa has many layers of security to keep the traveling public safe and to constantly adapt to evolving threats. that's their take on this, but it sounds to me based on what you two were saying that we'll have to go a lot further here. are they going to have to revamp all their security measures? >> you know, campbell, there's only so much you can do. the reason this is really hard, first of all, let's remember, while there are -- it is true, there are many layers of security, this is really the last point at which you get a serious inspection before you get on that plane. they could do it at the gate, they don't any longer, so it is -- it's very serious that we now have public -- what is our procedure at that last checkpoint. they can put in place some random measures that go beyond, that are unpredictable. the unpredictability is always a help when you're trying to thwart somebody who's trying to get past your procedures. but i will tell you, it's a real challenge, because the detail in

this memo really does lay out what is our philosophy about checkpoint screening. how do we make judgments about when you can't do everything all the time, what are the judgments about what's most important? that's not going to change, even if you change the manual. so that's part of what makes this such, i think, a serious breach. >> and clark, do you think they get it, how serious this is? >> well, you know, i wonder about that, campbell. the fact that tsa has pointed out that there are a number of layers to security. every time i hear that, every time we have an incident like this, and there's never been an incident this bad, every time there's a similar incident, the response is, there's multiple layers. as fran said, this is the last line of defense. if terrorists get past the screening checkpoint, that really is the last time. this comes against a backdrop of other problems. there's a gao report out in the last day or so that says almost $500 million has been spent to deploy technologies against which no cost/benefit analysis has been applied or risk

analysis. there's an inspector general report out today or yesterday that says that millions of dollars of equipment is in a warehouse that could be used to make it safer. and every year, on a quarterly basis, it seems, there's another inspector general report or tsa report or media investigation showing just how easy it is to get these weapons past screeners if you are a determined investigator or terrorist. so i think there is a laissez-faire attitude here. it's no guarantee this won't happen again, but we need to have leadership at the tsa and we need it now. >> it's certainly not very comforting to hear all of this as we get ready for our holiday travel. clark kent irvine and fran townsend with us tonight, to both of you, appreciate your time. >> thank you. tonight, our special investigation, "global warming: trick or truth?" when we come back.

an urgent warning on cleemt change tonight. the past decade has been the hottest on record. that big announcement made by the world meteorological society. the big question, of course, what do we do about it? thousands of world leaders and scientists are at the u.n. summit in copenhagen trying to figure that out right now. becky anderson is there. becky, this conference started with a hacked e-mail scandal, calling into question the very science of climate change. today, another scandal is hanging over it. this one involving a leaked memo. what is going on? >> reporter: that's right, campbell. it's day two here. and if you thought the toxic clouds of climategate had lifted, well, think again.

it's got all sort of polluted here in copenhagen. this time, by a conspiratorial and potentially much more divisive event. and this is what i'm talking about. this document has been dubbed the danish next. the it was written up by the danes on behalf of the u.s. and the uk. and it has got the developing nations here in a right old spin. because effectively, this proposal, if it were to be agreed on by some of the bigger nations here, would effectively give rich nations significant power over the billions of dollar that would be distributed to poorer countries as a result of any new agreement. i've got to say that we can't quite work out what role this proposal would or might take. the negotiations, of course, are going on behind closed doors, but this has been leaked by the

guardian newspaper. and as we understand, it is now doing the rounds, specifically with india, brazil, and china. the sense from the other developing nations here, i'm talking about the smaller ones, and don't forget, the climate change is so important to those smaller nations. it's where you're seeing the visible effects of global warming. they say they are being cut out of negotiations. they say that the deianes on behalf of the u.s. and the uk are going after the big guys and trying to drive a wedge between brazil, india, and china and the rest of the developing world. what they're saying is simply this -- don't leave us out of the meat and potato negotiations, the bargaining that's going on behind closed doors before these world leaders turn up next week. this could be really big. we don't know how it's going to play out at this point, but it's certainly extremely divisive and potentially quite destructive to

any political agreement we might get by the end of next week. campbell? >> oh, so bottom line, becky, president obama could be really walking into a firestorm next week. and beyond the intense negotiations going on there, there are also a lot of theatrics in copenhagen right now. >> reporter: that's right. i think i told you last night that people have come from every corner of the world, delegates here and there, there are thousands and thousands of them. and they've also come from a little bit farther. have a listen to this. >> our plant was destroyed by global warming. we are here in search of a real climate deal. >> reporter: whatever it takes to get your message out. campbell? >> thanks, becky. and while the world leaders are trying to figure out a plan to fight global warming, critics here at home telling president obama to do nothing when he goes

to copenhagen next week. billions of dollars at stake, not to mention clean water, clean air, clean food. so who has it right? we'll hear from scientists, skeptics, lawmakers and try to get to the bottom of it. >> the u.n. should throw the red flag, it should call a time out. if it takes a year or two to get to the bottom of the climategate scandal, so be it. this is a honda pilot. and this is the chevy traverse. it has more cargo space than pilot. and traverse beats honda on highway gas mileage too. more fuel efficient and 30% more room. maybe traverse can carry that stuff too. now during the chevy red tag event, get an '09 traverse with 0 percent apr for 72 months. see red and save green. now at your local chevy dealer. my congestion is so bad right now i really am looking forward to getting relief. i've never used afrin before. relief!

oh, it's like night and day. can i keep this? (announcer) afrin. why suffer? your own seafood feast at red lobster. choose two or three from new creations... like wood-grilled shrimp with garlic creme and parmesan... to classics like succulent steamed crab legs. for a limited time, at red lobster. to classics like succulent steamed crab legs. somewhere in america, there's a home by the sea powered by the wind on the plains. there's a hospital where technology has a healing touch. there's a factory giving old industries new life. and there's a train that got a whole city moving again. somewhere in america, the toughest questions are answered every day. because somewhere in america, 69,000 people spend every day answering them.

siemens. answers. maybe these are among the most important. centrum and age-adjusted centrum silver. now in new smaller tablet formulas. from the #1 doctor recommended multivitamin brand. centrum and centrum silver. the climategate e-mail scandal is sending aftershocks way beyond copenhagen all the way to capitol hill. it is giving new ammunition to opponents of president obama's plan to cap carbon emissions. the president has been pushing his far-reaching proposal for years, but his political

opponents say the controversial e-mails are really -- a really good reason to push pause. i'm joined now by republican congressman, darrell issa and democratic congressman, jay inslee. appreciate both of you joining us tonight. congressman issa, let me start with you. i know you want the obama administration to hold off on changing environmental policy in the wake of these e-mails. but yesterday you said that you've always believed the science that says global warming is happening. so why hold off, then? >> well, the important thing is that depending upon the speed and how much of what is happening in the way of cyclical warming depends on whether or not we have 150-year or a 300-year problem or a two-year problem. if we have, let's say, a slightly slower warming and less of it is coming from the human element, we might very well be able to transition out of fossil fuel, get to a sustainable environment with all positive

investments. on the other hand, if we need to do it immediately to stop a cataclysmic event, which we could stop, then the president's initiative would probably fit. the important question is, what is the honest science so that we can use the best solution at the best value with least loss of jobs, perhaps even no loss of jobs. the problem is creating jobs or losing jobs. >> let me bring congressman inslee in here. congressman, obviously people have questions about these e-mails. our latest cnn poll shows that more people now doubt the global warming science. do you think that controversy, fairly or unfairly, could ultimately derail any legislation? >> no, because inaction is deadly here. it's deadly for our health and it's deadly for our economy. and the world really is revolved in here into a couple groups that deny facts. there's the birthers who deny that president obama is a legitimate president. and there's the deniers that deny that global warming and

ocean acidification are in fact threats to our health and to our economy. and the simple facts, and these are not opinions, these are facts. we have now found, talking to nasa and the national ocean graphic group and scientists across the globe that the rate of global warming has accelerated in the last five years. the rate of melting of the arctic has increased by 40%. the rate of acidification of the pacific and atlantic oceans is now 30% more acidic than in pre-industrial times. the scientists have told us that delay is deadly and we've recently had a health report from the united states government about the health impacts in this regard. >> let me just stop you there. because the problem is, you keep say the scientists say, the scientists say, but can't you see that what's happened with these e-mails, again, fairly or unfairly, has caused a lot of people to doubt what the scientists are saying. their credibility was damaged by

this. you know, whether, again, it deserved to be, or not. so how do you address that problem going forward? >> look, we have seen this movie before. the tobacco industry tried to discredit the science, the huge scientific consensus about lung cancer and tobacco connection. we're seeing the same movie play out here today. and we have the same degree of scientific consensus. regardless of what happened in england, those scientists may have sent untoward e-mails with language that's not in the king's english, but the scientists, john holdren, nasa, noaa, the people who put the man on the moon have told us that the climate is changing in deadly ways. >> congressman issa, explain to me, you are going to copenhagen now, as i understand it, explain why. what's the point of your trip? what are you trying to say? >> first of all, although jay's

assumptions, i have some questions about, and i would be glad to meet with him offline. the fact is, we do have some real questions about the underlying facts. "an inconvenient truth" was based on these studies, which now are in doubt. it's a question of not, do we need to deal with our environment. certainly, jay and i would both say that we've got to get off of coal and the acid rain coming from it. there are a lot of pollutants we have to deal with that we're not even denying. when it comes to co2, it's a question of, do we have to take the draconian measure of getting rid of co2 immediately, having offsets, is that the the most important place to put millions of dollars, or should we get off of coal, reducing pollutants, and finding sustainable energy, and do we have enough time to spend the money in a proactive way. i will not buy into the hysteria that the world is going to end tomorrow if we fly to copenhagen on a 747 that consumes fossil

fuel. at the same time, i certainly want to make sure that we're looking and listening to all science, that we get accurate science to replace the corrupted information we now know exists. and that we reach a good conclusion. oh, and by the way, in the case of copenhagen, make sure that any treat that is agreed to covers china, brazil, india, so that we're not reducing co2 and jobs in america while china and india are increasing. we've got to make sure if this is the right course of action, that we do it in a way that holds all of us responsible to reduce co2 gases. i don't want to save half the world, because that doesn't work in climate. you have to save the whole world or nobody. >> all right. congressman inslee, in our attempts, as we do here many nights, to find a little common ground, what in what congressman issa just said can you agree with going forward? >> well, i think it's important to pay attention to china. it's very important.

because if darrell goes to copenhagen, i hope to go as well, what we're going to learn is what i learned in china last month. they are spending $11 billion a month on clean energy. and the question is, which country is going to dominate the production of electric cars and lithium batteries? us or china? are we going to generate the jobs here or in china on solar panels and wind turbines? it is real clear that there is going to be a huge market for clean energy. we want to make sure that those jobs and those products are created in america. now, if we do what darrell wants to do, which is to not to act for another 10 or 20 years, china is going to eat our lunch and though -- >> jay, jay -- >> let me finish. what we agree on -- >> you're saying i don't want to do something for 20 or 10 years, and that's not what i said. >> in fairness, that's not what he said. he said he wanted to look closer at science.

let's keep it in the realm of what he actually said. >> i'll tell you, china is not waiting to move forward to create jobs in china. we should not be waiting to create jobs in america. >> that we agree on. >> when we do this, we are going to jump-start the creation of millions of jobs, green-colored jobs in this country. building solar cells, build electric cars, building lithium ion batteries. in this bill does not pass the u.s. congress this year, those jobs are going to china. that's one of the reasons we cannot wait. >> got end to end it there. there are the politics of climate change and then there's the science. the facts are stubborn thing and tom foreman is working the magic wall tonight to help us break down the facts. take 2 extra strength tylenol every 4 to 6 hours?!? taking 8 pills a day... and if i take it for 10 days -- that's 80 pills.

just 2 aleve can last all day. perfect. choose aleve and you can be taking four times... fewer pills than extra strength tylenol. just 2 aleve have the strength to relieve arthritis pain all day. right now 1.2 million people are on sprint mobile broadband. 31 are streaming a sales conference from the road. 154 are tracking shipments on a train. 33 are iming on a ferry. and 1300 are secretly checking email on a vacation. that's happening now. america's most dependable 3g network. bringing you the first and only wireless 4g network. right now get a free 3g/4g device for your laptop. sprint. the now network. deaf, hard-of-hearing and people with speech disabilities access www.sprintrelay.com (announcer) take your time to find the right time

with cialis for daily use... a clinically proven, low-dose tablet for erectile dysfunction you take every day so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away.

(announcer) 36-hour cialis. or cialis for daily use. ask your doctor about cialis today, so when the moment is right, you can be ready. some breaking news tonight. a possible deal on health care reform. democrats apparently have worked out a plan that would drop the government-run public option. we're going to have much more on this later in the hour. but, first, 2009 could be one of the warmest years ever recorded. that word today from forecasters at the u.n. climate change conference. they expect this year to go down as the fifth warmest worldwide, despite cooler temperatures in the u.s. and canada. nearly 200 countries trying to hammer out an agreement to combat global warming. not an easy task when you consider even the most basic

questions undergo intense debate and scrutiny. tonight, our tom foreman is breaking down the arguments on both sides of these key issues that are at stake here. tom, take it away. >> you know, campbell, one of the real issues that people have been debating here is whether or not the earth is still warming or may be getting cooler. some skeptics say they believe it's getting cooler. why do they think that? i want to bring up something for you to look at. these are pictures taken from nasa from the early 18 -- or developed by nasa, based on temperature readings from the early 1880s. you can watch, as time passes on, year by year, with these average temperatures, that a lot more oranges and yellows and reds start appearing over time. this is back in the early 1880s, very little of it. as time progresses, you see it starts getting darker and darker and more of it appearing. based on these numbers and these maps put together by nasa, they've created a sense of how the earth really is warming up. if that's what's happening, then

when we look at the globe, why do some people say it's getting cooler? because of this, 1998, we laid it out on the earth here. this was a very, very warm year. this is the united states down here, up into canada, hudson bay, look at all that warmth up in there. this was the hottest year ever. skeptics say, look, if this was the hottest year ever, obviously, it's getting cooler. and other people say, no, the simple truth is, that's not the case. they look at something like this and say, there's still substantial evidence that was a spike, but all of these pictures we've seen so many times really do mean something. they mean the earth is getting warmer. so let's break it down just a little bit further than that and say, is there a consensus? because that's one of the arguments. does the scientific community know what's going on and agree on it? let's fly down to an iceberg as an example. here's our little iceberg here. listen to what the skeptics say. the skeptics say, no, there's no consensus that humans are a

significant factor in rising temperatures. there's no consensus that the results of warming will be catastrophic. part of the evidence is, if their scientists are saying this, then, of course, there's no consensus, if you mean a complete consensus. but when we turn this iceberg around and look at the other side over here, you see that, basically, a lot of the supporters of global warming theory say, maybe there's not complete consensus, but, boy, is there a lot of agreement. in a survey, more than 2,400 of the earth's scientists, 75 climate scientists, this is the vast majority in both of those categories, feel that humans are a significant factor in rising temperatures. so not everybody agrees, but most do. and they warn of floods, droughts, disease, and maybe a climatic tipping point, where we simply reach the point where we can't cool the earth down. the problem for both sides is, and if you look at this, you can see, one side seems to have a lot of scientific weight. the other one, not so much.

the problem is the last part, which we'll go through right here as we move under water. and that is the great amount of unknown data about this. both sides will say, the reason we're having a debate is because, for as much as we do know about climate change, there's still a lot we don't know that we have to work on. that's what's fueling the debate. people would like it to be black and white. it's harder to make it that. there is a lot of evidence on one side, but the other side is not entirely without things to say too. campbell? >> all right. tom foreman, breaking it down for us tonight. tom, thanks very much. tv's bill nye the science guy has some very strong views on global warming, but at least one of his fellow scientists is not buying it and they are here tonight to make their case when we come back. let's say we crashed. whoops, you lost your phone and you're disoriented. i'm not disoriented. now you are. onstar automatic crash response can call to see if you're ok. onstar emergency. is everything ok howie? you don't answer, they can

automatically send help to your exact location. i think i'll ride with you. the award-winning malibu. from chevy.

scientists at the copenhagen climate conference today said global warming shows no signs of slowing down. they are confident in today's data because it comes from three separate sources. that's something we might have taken at face value before the hacked e-mail scandal called the very science behind global warming into question. joining me right now is educator bill nye the science guy and also patrick jay michaels, a senior fellow at the kato

institute, libertarian research institute. and his book, "climate of extremes: global warming science they don't want you to know," he has a very different take on this from bill. so let's get into this with you first, patrick, because you were singled out in some of these e-mails and the scientists in question, not at all fans of your work. one wrote, quote, "next time i see pat michaels at a scientific meeting, i'll be tempted to beat the crap out of him." why are they targeting you? >> maybe they need some anger management treatment, i don't know. they did not like the fact that i had written an op-ed in october that was called "the dog ate global warming," which had to do with the fact that easting an leah had lost the data with the global warming in the mid1980s. i take exception with that. i want to tell you something. we heard a lot of noise, a lot of heat about this.

there'll be some good news that m k comes out of this, and i bet you bill will agree with me. that scientific data becomes much more open. the journals will do everything they can to act like they're not being intimidated. this will turn out to be a very good thing if we wait for the storm to settle itself. >> and bill, to that point, i mean, these e-mails did make it seem like scientists aren't willing to have an open debate on this. do you believe that there is room for debate? >> room for debate about what? >> about the specifics of global warming. >> well, sure. you talk about the specifics. but this -- i complete agree, you're right, dr. michaels, way to go. >> thank you! >> really, it will make -- ultimately, yeah. but in the meantime, like, for example, ms. brown, you guys are running this crawl across the bottom of the screen that goes,

i've been watching it, it goes about evenly people who support the idea what we're doing in copenhagen is very important and people are opposed for it for political reasons. and it makes it look like the debate is even. like there's as many people on one side as the other. but in the scientific community, we strongly emphasize that that's not the case at all and this is why, i think is why, you find people who want to sock patrick michaels in the chops, as he's very well credentialed and he's on the other side of this thing. >> let me stop you there, though, bill. because you're right. i mean, here's the problem you have. the scientific community is not evenly divided on this. there are a few people who disagree with the vast majority of the scientific community. but the fact is -- >> nobel prize. >> the fact is, though, and you can't deny this, is that these e-mails, the way they were written, it was very troubling to a lot of people. and that was damaging to the credibility of that majority of scientists who may have been doing work properly and

following all the right regulations. so what's happened is, you see this division among the general public. that is that little crawl you see under your screen. and that's a problem. that's a problem for scientists who believe global warming is a problem. you've got to get people on board. >> well, sure. yeah, i think the analogy that congressman inslee brought up earlier in the show about smoking is -- it's a very common analogy, but it's very good. where people deny it for a long time and after a while people get worn out. and as dr. michaels pointed out, after a while, after these data are public, it'll blow over and this thing will become common knowledge. but, in the meantime, i'll just remind you, that the few phrases that are in there show you the power of the internet and that, ultimately, these things will, i think, sort themselves out. >> let me tell you -- >> there's a lot of e-mails -- say again? >> let me tell you the way they're sorting out.

something very interesting had happened in the last two days. we hear that the east anglia e-mails are not important because there are other climate records. now it's been found out that the national climatic data center has data in australia that has a 6 degree per century trend in it that was put in the data when the real data don't have the trend. and we're seeing in alaska, central alaska, where every climate scientist knows there was a jump in temperature in the mid-1970s, and they haven't done much after that, we see another trend superimposed upon the data there. the result of climategate, people are looking very carefully at the data. it's going to be good, bill, just hang on. we'll get better science. >> these are very specific things, especially when you talk about surface temperatures in one part of the world, especially a part of the world where we have very good sensors. >> that's true. bill, i agree with you. let me tell you something about

strat str stratospheric temperatures. they don't show a decline. something very funny is going on in the atmosphere. i'm not going to tell you that i know and anybody that tells you that they know, i'm gong to be rather skeptical of it at this point in time, because that stratosphere is a global behavior, not a local behavior, and it's not doing the right thing. >> well, everybody presupposes it's a global behavior. >> the satellites measure the temperature globally. round and round the planet. >> okay, all right. >> you're the science guy. >> well, i was of the opinion that hurricanes would get stronger. well, somehow, there's something gone on where they're getting decapitated. so if you have a theory that disagrees with what goes on in nature, the problem is almost, certainly, with the theory, not with nature. so i'm open mind there had with you on that. >> hurricanes are real complicated beasts. >> all right. >> yes. the claim that the scientists in

copenhagen have a conspiracy to defeat conservative elements, especially in the united states, is not a very reasonable theory to me. >> no, no, but they can certainly try to pressure journal editor to keep quiet -- >> all right, guys -- >> we got to go? >> i would love it if you could get a little common ground to end on. >> it's going to be good in the end. >> it's going to be great. do you agree we'd be better off if we were less inefficient in our energy production? >> of course. the future belongs to -- >> and on that note -- >> do you agree that we could save about 30%? >> i believe campbell says i've got to say good-bye, bill. have a good night. >> actually, bill, you're going to get more time, no offense, patrick, but we are going to talk, not necessarily about climb change, but about conservation and some of the specifics of what we can all be doing. i think we can all agree on that, with bill nye when we come back. stay with us, bill, you'll get a lot more time to finish your thought. thank you, gentleman.

lls that separate people from people, but it is impossible to build a wall that separates a man from his freedom. because freedom always finds a path... to build peace. this film is dedicated to aung san suu kyi, still prisoner in burma. ♪ well, look who's here. it's ellen. hey, mayor white. how you doing? great. come on in. would you like to see our new police department? yeah, all right. this way. and here it is. completely networked. so, anything happening, suz? she's all good.

oh, my gosh. is that my car? [ whirring ] [ female announcer ] the new community. see it. live it. share it. on the human network. cisco.

the u.s. department of energy says the average family spends about $1,900 a year on home utility bills. electricity generated by fossil fuels for a single home puts more carbon dioxide into the air than two average cars. so whether you believe in global warming or not, we can all agree it is a good thing to try to conservative and to save some cash in the process and bill nye the science guy is back with the

top few ways to save money, save energy, everyday things that you can do to cut your carbon footprint. bill, bawelcome back. and tell me the single most important thing people can do at home to save energy. what is it? >> the quickest payback is to weatherize your house, to seal the leaks. and if you want to get serious about it, insulate your attic more thoroughly. if you want to get really serious about it, put it in new windows. the new windows is pretty expensive, but the decrease in your energy bill is remarkable. then you hear a lot of talk about lightbulbs. it's a real thing. if you replace all your lightbulbs with modern, more efficient ones, be they compact fluorescent or the next generation light-emiting diode, led, your electric bill goes down. it's remarkable. the striking thing, the thing

that's really hard for us to get our minds around, if everybody does it, if everybody reduces our electric use 8%, 10%, power companies don't have to build, if i may, a whole another power plant. it just doesn't seem -- it's not intuitive, at first. but if you think about it, it all has to add up, and indeed, it does. it's really satisfying, i tell you, personally, when you pay 7 bucks a month for electricity. it's really -- it's fun! that's cool. >> fun. >> it's a lot of investment, but it's a lot less investment -- let me just say. a big investment in windows is usually quite a bit less than the investment in a typical sport utility vehicle. and the windows last 25 years, not three or four, 30 years. >> and like you said, you don't even have to go that far. it can be about changing your lightbulbs. and on a separate issue, we all have these electronic gadgets that we basically just leaved plugged in, charging our various -- you name it.

>> i want a young engineer to solve that problem, so that the charger knows it's not plugged into the phone and turns itself off without using any energy. >> people don't realize that, if you leave it plugged in, it's using energy. >> yeah, 8% of our energy in north america goes to nothing but keeping stuff -- electronics on standby. it's a solvable problem. let's get on it. let's change the world. >> bill nye the science guy. bill, appreciate you coming on tonight. thanks so much. >> thank you. "larry king live" coming up next with breaking news tonight from capitol hill. a deal in the senate on health care reform. could it take the public option off the table? our dana bash has the very latest when we come back. bonus . what you do with it is up to you. what will you get back with your cash back?

now more than ever, it pays to discover. there's new robitussin® to go. in a neat little single dose spoon. liquid medicine already dissolved ready for your body to take in. new robitussin® to go. pure robitussin® relief... to go.

by changing her medicare prescription plan. all we had to do was go to cvs.com and use the free savings calculator. we learned that changing your medicare part d plan could save an average of $612. woman: we just entered my prescriptions, and it compared plans for us. it was easy to find the right plan for the prescriptions i need. your cvs pharmacist can help, too. come in today, or go to cvs.com before december 31st to find the best plan for you -- at cvs/pharmacy. "o" for objectivity. one of the basic principles of td ameritrade. it means you help investors... you don't just sell them. it means no hidden agenda. td ameritrade always has...always will... put the investor-- you--first. that's how they work. that's how they deliver objective investing help. that's what td ameritrade stands for. what does your investment firm stand for?

it's time for fresh thinking. it's time for td ameritrade. breaking news right now. we want to get right back to dana bash on capitol hill where there is a deal tonight on health care reform. could that deal spell the end of the public option? dana, what are you hearing? >> reporter: well, campbell, as we first reported at the top of the hour that the democratic senators who have been meeting for some time, and this is led by the democratic leader, they have reached a tentative deal to, effectively, drop the public option from the democrat's health care plan. now, the public option, as you well know, is one of the most controversial parts of the plan. and one that divides democrats, very much so. so what we understand is that they have put that aside and that they have a tentative deal to try to come up with other

ways to make insurance more affordable and to increase competition for private insurers, which is really the goal of the mostly liberal democrats who have been staunchly supportive of a public option. earlier, during these negotiations, our understanding is that one of the main components of this deal was to offer nonprofit insurance offered by private insurers, but it would also be overseen by government agencies. our understanding is that that is still in there, but very interesting, campbell, these democratic leaders who actually just had a press conference on this deal, they are being incredibly mum on the details. they won't give us any information about what's in this. they say the reason is because they're sending it to the congressional budget office to get information about how much all of this is going to cost and they don't want to give that us before they get that information. we're dilling for more information, pu that's what we know at this point. headline is, tentatively, a public option is now going to be gone from the democrats' health care plan. >> all right. dana bash from capitol hill tonight with the very latest on